Sunday, March 13, 2011

Let's reflect: Our Group Assignment

First, the ezlearners are great team players and collaborate well together. We have built-up our own social identity, which is easily visualized by the two letter acronym “ez”, in front of our first names. EZ is pronounced “easy” and reflects the current online working relationship. The group feels at ease communicating with different computer tools and online assignments are well structured and organized. Flaming is unheard of and everyone has a sincere interest at heart. The ez-ies are so diverse that each member can contribute with his or her strengths; deadlines are met and assignments well presented both orally or written. We have techies on board, professional writers, teachers all contributing to each group assignment.
In the previous assignment the group’s task was to discuss different online communication tools using the group’s forum. The assignment was clear the roles were quickly identified and volunteers were at hand. The forum discussion on online communication tools was a good exercise to conduct using a forum. The topic was not too complex in nature, thus creating a lively and an embracing discussion with nicely flowing posts. The responsibilities of each team player were clear and no additional assistance was required from outside.

Of course an online discussion in a forum (computer-mediated communication) is faced with the obvious reduced social cues. It is impossible to communicate with a real smile, agreeing or supporting an idea by nodding or giving a facial expression of disappointment. While posting you can use emoticons, however, most ez-ies only use smiley faces and other expressions are rarely posted. Is it an emotionally controlled, static and virtual environment. In a face to face discussion you can follow the cues of the other participants (body language, eye contact, facial expressions, stress and intonation of words) as well as viewing the interaction of all group members during a discussion.



"Where is everyone?" A forum is not a synchronous form of communication, nor is it a F2F meeting. What is it?

I believe that an online forum discussion is to be seen as a written form of communication that offers an asynchronous, computer-based communication, which does not need to resemble an oral discussion, nor should it be compared to it.  If classified as a written type of communication, we can see the advantages more clearly as if we tend to compare it more to oral communication. Written forms of computer-based communication, such as emails, chat or participating to new social networking sites, provide other advantages and should not be simple categorized as second-rate to f2f meetings or discussions. Seen as an addition, not a replacement, give them a valid position in today’s world of communication, in particular for learning environments. For our assignment, the forum was better than exchanging emails back and forth or using e.g. a chat-room. Here is a list of some more advantages:

Advantages of Forum Discussions:
·        Members do not have to be present at all times (asynchronous)
·        Time to reflect and prepare a response to the posts (in-depth responses)
·        A complex subject or task can be discussed at length over
       a longer time period (longevity)

·        A written record is available as well as a summary report (recordable)
·        Focus is more on content rather than on verbal cues
       (charisma, enthusiasms, etc.) or body language




When viewing the advantages of a forum , we can see that it is useful to communicate among those not gathered in one room at a particular time. To ensure that online discussion continues to flow and that follow-up posts respond to previous ones, an online moderator may be helpful to steer conversations. I feel that the moderator has a very important role when the topics are more complex and the participants tend to lose track of the original assignment.

Finally, the advantage of working with forums is that the threads are documented in written form and can be summarized (recordable) into a short report. Members can prepare their posts and offer in-depth replies to previous posts. In our case, ez-eva summarized the loose discussion threads in a table and provided a short report, which was exemplary.  In conclusion, adding new forms of computer-based communication offer different means of communication and can be used effectively for different learning scenarios.

Sunday, March 6, 2011

Hot Potatoes


Joggling life isn’t always easy


   
We are happy when everything runs smoothly. My job, my family and my studies. Well, I’ve got my joggling balls in my hand ready to start my life’s performing act of dealing with a very rewarding job as a language teacher, a wonderful caring and supportive husband and a spunky, bright daughter, who has just returned from Asia. Last but not least, my personal goal to add one more joggling ball “my Master’s” to the many tasks I constantly joggle. Everything runs smoothly, timing is of the essence and organization talent is needed for this hyper-management task, and somehow you manage everything. But suddenly and unexpected a creepy virus sneaks up on you after returning from a wonderful vacation and everything crashes. Well, I’m back on track….



Hot Potatoes, Version 6.3
Authoring Systems and Rapid E-learning (Individual Task, Part I)
What do you know about the ezLearners?
Do the ez-quiz from Hot Potatoes and click on the link www.ezregina.pbworks.com





Authoring Systems and Rapid E-learning (Individual Task, Part II)

HOT POTATOES for ELT
Review of six applications for student activities online
Why Hot Potatoes?
During my job interview for my current position, I was asked if I have ever worked with Hot Potatoes. Unfortunately, I had to say no. These applications are widely used in foreign language teaching, especially in EL and; therefore, I thought it would be a great opportunity to review this tool and create a simple mini quiz using H.P. for my ezLearners study group (please see below for the link).
Hot Potatoes is a computer program that consists of a set of six applications that allows language teachers to create their own web-based activities for their students. The suite creates: 1. a gap-fill excise with JCloze. 2.a question-based quiz with JQuiz.3. a crossword puzzle maker, JCross. 4. an exercise where you match items using JMatch. 5. a jumbled-sentence exercise using JMix. 6. Finally, combines all applications into one unit using The Masher. These applications were developed for language exercises and not for testing purposes. They do not meet the security requirements for language testing scenarios and are not intended for this use. The applications are thought as exercises and should only be used in this context.

It supports today’s standard browsers. It also is able to use Unicode and it can be used in all languages or even with more than one language.  It is widely known in ELT. It allows audio and video material to be uploaded into each exercise and offers a gallery of clipart. The exercises also offer hints and give instant feedback on mistakes. A timer can be added to each exercise. These are very simple to use applications that do not require knowledge HTML or JavaScript, but advanced users have the opportunity to customize the applications.
The basic version is freeware for individuals and educational institutions if the user offers their exercises online. A license fee applies to those using it in closed learning environments. H.P. is not open source and was developed by the University of Victoria Humanities Computing and Media Centre in Canada. The tool is available at http://hotpot.uvic.ca/ There is also a extensive 40-page handbook available for download. Hot Potatoes also offers its own hosting services, a commercial branch, known as Half- Baked Software Inc. at www.hotpotatoes.net. This fee paid service offers a learning environment with teacher and student accounts. This is a hosting solution for those teachers that do not have access to an LMS or wish to use the extended services. In addition, H.P. offers support for SCORM 1.2 and thus, it can be integrated into an LMS. As of September 2009 support for these applications (latest version 6.3) has ceased. Currently, the developers are planning a new version.
Finally, I could imagine using these applications in my wiki-based courses. In particularly, the simple multiple-choice quizzes are excellent for vocabulary review. I can’t say that I have missed anything specific that the suite does not offer, however it is always very interesting to see how students, in particular adults, react to these type of exercises. In a word full advanced visual graphics, I could imagine that some students might find these applications not exciting enough. But, it is worth a try. From a teacher’s point of view the authoring tool is easy to use, logical and has a good tutorial. Overall, it is a very good tool, specifically geared for language learning.